What The Author Did: Nothing to Lose (Jack Reacher) by Lee Child

Note: This article contains affiliate links

In the What the Author Did series, we pull back the curtain on great fiction and take a closer look at the techniques the writer has employed, their purpose and effect. This isn't about reviewing books — it's about exploring the craft choices that shaped the final work and learning from them.

In this instalment of What the Author Did we're examining the techniques British author Lee Child uses in his 2008 novel, Nothing to Lose, the twelfth book in the hugely successful Jack Reacher series.

As of June 2025, there are 29 Jack Reacher novels, the first 24 of which were written by Child alone, the following 3 co-written with younger brother Andrew Child, who, since book 28, has taken over writing of the series.

The books have spawned several spin-offs and adaptations beyond the main novels, including short stories, blockbuster movies, and a streaming TV series. Learn more about the books and the authors at jackreacher.com.

NOTE: There are no plot spoilers in this article, but if you haven't yet read Nothing to Lose, the discussion points may impact your first impressions.

Taut narrative expertly handled

The first thing to notice about Nothing to Lose, right from the opening pages, is how effortless it is to get into the story. No long backstory or character descriptions, no pages and pages of setup, no feeling like you're standing outside the story trying to get in.

But while this may be effortless to read, as a writer it takes a thorough understanding of the thriller genre and its techniques to pull off. As Nathaniel Hawthorne, the 19th-century American novelist, said, 'Easy reading is damn hard writing.'

So let's take a look at some of the methods Child employs.

Opening in medias res. A common technique when you want to get your story off to a compelling start is to drop your readers into the middle of the action in the opening chapter. This could be chapter one, or it could be a prologue depicting a past, present, or future event.

In Nothing to Lose, Child opens with a short chapter depicting the thoughts of a dying man out in the open, under the sun, with no food or water. We won't know for some time who this man is or why he's dying, but the narrative lays a trail of clues that will make sense later.

Was he a man or a boy? He had been described both ways. Be a man, some had said. Others had been insistent: The boy's not to blame. He was old enough to vote and kill and die, which made him a man. He was too young to drink, even beer, which made him a boy.

The voice in this opening chapter is distinct, conflict is implied, and a lot is packed into a short space but only what matters. No names or physical descriptions, only where the man's mind takes him in those moments before death—enough to raise the tension, and plant questions in readers' minds.

Keeping to the point. In the novel, short chapters—and narrative breaks in longer chapters—move the story forward at pace, and urge readers into 'just one more chapter; just one more'. Additionally, Child makes use of high-tension chapter endings, often splitting a conversation or scene over two chapters so readers are compelled to read on.

Likewise, short, punchy sentences have a similar effect on pace, narrative voice, and ambience. Take the following, for example:

The Crown Vic braked hard in the gutter. The door swung open. The driver took a riot gun from a holster between the seats. Climbed out. Pumped the gun and held it diagonally across his chest. He was a big guy. White, maybe forty. Black hair. Wide neck. Tan jacket, brown pants, black shoes, a groove in his forehead from a Smokey the Bear hat that was presumably now resting on his passenger seat.

A simple description that gives us a vivid picture of the cop in question. Reacher notes what he sees in the order he sees it (loaded riot gun, gender, size, race, age, physical attributes), skimming over the nondescript clothes (tan jacket, brown pants, black shoes), and allotting attention to the detail (groove in the man's forehead, suggesting a long time in the job).

Withholding information. Aside from the many mysterious strands pertaining to the main plot, Child ensures readers remain curious by withholding information about the characters or subplots, too. For example, where is Officer Vaughan's husband? Without asking her directly, Reacher raises several theories throughout the book that Vaughan dismisses, keeping us guessing about what her marital situation is, and whether the pair will take their acquaintance in the direction it appears to be heading.

'And then you went to the library? Don't you ever sleep?' (Reacher asks Vaughan)

'Not so much any more.'

'Since when? Since what?'

'I don't want to talk about it.'

'Your husband?'

'I said I don't want to talk about it.'

NOTE: I discuss ways to inject curiosity into your stories, and keep your readers turning the pages, in Curiosity in Fiction: Does your novel pass the test?

Snappy dialogue. Dialogue is so much more than just conveying information from one character to another, and Child demonstrates this with curt conversations that succinctly convey more about those speaking than any lines of description ever could. Simple, but so effective.

The guy standing at the head of the table was the biggest of the four, by maybe an inch and ten pounds. He said, 'You're not going to eat at all.'

Reacher said, 'I'm not?'

'Not here, anyway.'

'I heard this was the only show in town.'

'It is.'

'Well, then.'

'You need to get going.'

'Going?'

'Out of here.'

'Out of where?'

'Out of this restaurant.'

'You want to tell me why?'

'We don't like strangers.'

'Me either,' Reacher said. 'But I need to eat somewhere. Otherwise I'll get all wasted and skinny like you four.'

'Funny man.'

'Just calling it like it is,' Reacher said. He put his forearms on the table...

Note that the only times Child uses a dialogue tag is to make it clear who's talking and to change the pace and rhythm of the conversation. Any more than that would have dulled the effect of this tense and lightly humorous back and forth that reveals much about character.

Using setting to maximum effect

In How to Write A Gripping Thriller, I talked about settings that enhance tension by heightening fear and restricting options. In Nothing to Lose, Child uses a near-desolate, far-from-anywhere 'company town' named Despair as the closely guarded, boiler-pot setting in which his plot unfolds.

This fictional town in Colorado is portrayed as a grim industrial town with sinister secrets and inhabitants who have a strong dislike of strangers. Its neighbouring town, Hope, where Reacher meets Vaughan, is easygoing and welcoming, and represents the moral and thematic opposite of Despair.

All the customers were men. They were all tired, all grimy, all dressed in work shirts, all sipping beer from tall glasses or long-neck bottles. Reacher had seen none of them before.

He stepped into the gloom, quietly. Every head turned and every pair of eyes came to rest on him. Some kind of universal bar-room radar. Stranger in the house. Reacher stood still and let them take a good look.

The hostility Reacher encounters in the town pervades the novel, exacerbating the constant threat of harm, as he persists in crossing the line from the safety of Hope into Despair in order to get to the truth of what the town is hiding.

A stellar protagonist with plenty of scope

Given the popularity and longevity of the series, it goes without saying that Child has mined character gold with Jack Reacher. As this was my first Reacher book, it allowed me an outsider perspective on what the author has done to make the man so appealing as a protagonist. Let's take a look.

Avoids the stereotype. Yes, Reacher is an army veteran. Yes, he's a big, muscular guy with buckets of confidence and no emotional or geographic ties. Yes, he holds his own in a fight and never backs down. So, yes, it would be easy for him to slip into the lone-wolf, action-hero stereotype. But there are several things that redeem him from such a fate:

• He's not perfect (in normal, random ways). Reacher admits in this book to not being the fastest runner because of his size, nor the greatest driver.

  
  

• He has his quirks, which, pleasingly, are shown but not examined. Such as assessing coffee by its taste, texture, and the receptacle it's served in: The coffee was hot, strong, and smooth. The mug was cylindrical, narrow in relation to its height, made of delicate bone china, and it had a thin lip. 'Excellent,' Reacher said.

  
  

  He also has an affinity for numbers, including tracking time mentally: The clock in Reacher's head hit one in the morning and the clock on the diner's wall followed it a minute later.

  
  

• He's not fearless and he's not an irrational risk-taker. He doesn't go looking for violence, or act out of rage: Knives didn't miss. If they touched you, they cut you. The only opponents Reacher truly feared were small whippy guys with fast hands and sharp blades.

  
  

  He's cool, calm, and considers his actions carefully, maintaining a balance between thoughtfulness, duty, and justice.

In all, Jack Reacher manages to subvert the action hero stereotype by blending physical dominance with intellectual prowess, emotional detachment with moral conviction, and an enigmatic persona with quiet realism. He's not a flashy hero; more a quiet force of nature.

Weaves in character and backstory. There are no information dumps to distract readers in Nothing to Lose. We're not subjected to Reacher's life history, mental/emotional flaws, inner feelings, regrets for the past or dreams for the future. Instead, Child cleverly threads backstory and character into the narrative only where it it expands on the scene at hand.

For example, the build-up to a confrontation in a bar is where we learn how and when Reacher learned to fight.

Reacher stayed on his stool, tensed up and ready, but not visibly. Outwardly he was still calm and relaxed. His brother Joe had been two years older, physically very similar, but temperamentally very different. Joe had eased into fights. He had met escalation with escalation, reluctantly, slowly, rationally, patiently, a little sadly. Therefore he had been a frustrating opponent. Therefore according to the peculiar little-boy dynamics of the time his enemies had turned on Reacher himself, the younger brother. The first time, confronted with four baiting seven-year-olds, the five-year-old Reacher had felt a jolt of real fear.

It's midway through the book before we learn of Reacher's physicality, the many scars on his body; and only then because he's wearing a towel around his waist when Vaughan shows up at his door, and he sees himself from her perspective.

In another scene, we learn both about Reacher's past and his current situation through a frank piece of dialogue he has with the Despair judge:

The guy wrote it all down. Then he sniffed and skipped his pen back over the lines he had already completed and paused. Asked, 'What was your last address?'

'An APO box.'

'APO?'

'Army Post Office.'

'You're a veteran?'

'Yes, I am.'

'How long did you serve?'

'Thirteen years.'

'Until?'

'I mustered out ten years ago.'

'Unit?'

'Military Police.'

'Final rank?'

'Major.'

'And you haven't had a permanent address since you left the army?'

'No, I haven't.'

So much more enjoyable and effortless to learn about Reacher this way than through long spells of backstory. Plus, this style feeds into Reacher's character—he's not the kind of man to be constantly troubled by the past or worrying about the future; so these things are simply not on his mind, and thus not in the narrative.

In How to Write A Gripping Thriller, I mention that it's perfectly okay for readers to begin with a narrow lens and assimilate the wider view as the story progresses. That's precisely what Child has done in this book, with the effect that the reader is constantly being drawn forward deeper into the story—discovering, comprehending, making sense of the big picture, right until the very end.

As writers of series, we often try to find a suitable spot to drop in the protagonist's backstory, which may even include some of their past escapades from previous books—as if we need readers to know everything or be reminded of what's gone before. But depending on the structure of the series (i.e., rolling storyline and character arc, or independent plot), is that always necessary?

For example, having only read the one Jack Reacher book so far, the format is clear:

• Reacher as an active central protagonist around whom the story revolves;

• a plotline that begins in each new book, escalates, then completes by the end of the book;

• a flat character arc, in which Reacher is invested in the story's events, but emerges from them unscathed and unchanged.

In this format, there's no real need to know every aspect of Reacher's background or what's gone before; just that which relates to and expands upon the storyline in progress.

I get the feeling that when I pick up another Reacher book, I'll learn things I don't yet know about him—and rather than make me feel cheated or in the dark about his character, it makes me all the more intrigued.

Finally...

I was nervous about reading my first Reacher book. When a series does well commercially, sometimes the books themselves don't quite live up to the hype. But I'm thrilled to say I was relieved in this case. Right from the start, this book is a masterclass in what makes a thriller novel exciting, entertaining, and just about impossible to put down.

What stood out for me was Reacher as a unique and compelling protagonist, and also the well-written, taut and pacy narrative. In the book I sensed the echoes of past great thriller writers, but with a modern element and likeable protagonist I envision continuing for many more books to come.

Leave a comment below if you've read any of the Reacher books, and what techniques you find particularly intriguing or inspiring. Or to give me a heads-up on which Reacher book I should choose next...

Nothing to Lose (2008), Child, L., Bantam Press, Transworld, Penguin Random House, London

Sign up to the Fiction Yogi monthly newsletter

For writing tips, exclusive Fiction Yogi offers, and updates on the latest writing, editing and publishing resources in the Hub, including handy downloadable PDF guides, checklists and cheat sheets, sign up to the monthly newsletter. No spam guaranteed. In addition, receive the free booklet, 6 Powerful Ways to Convey Character: A short guide to articulating depth, emotion and personality in your fiction.

Tina Williams of Fiction Yogi is a copyeditor and proofreader who works with writers at all stages, giving them the tools to improve their manuscript and level up their writing so they can meet their publishing goals.

Get in touch

Browse the Resource Hub

Follow at: Instagram or Pinterest